Re: [Flash Operator Panel] FOP 0.26
Hi All, On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Florian Schoppmeier wrote: gus@xxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:Hello,example, I have 5 extensions configured, if I try to drag ext 220 over to ext 221, the phone will ring but as soon as I answer the call will get disconnected, because the ext number is missing. I downgraded to 0.25 and it works fine. I also tried the latest 0.27 snapshot but the problem doesnt get fixed there either. Anyone else having this problem? Appreciate any input. This is a known issue that I fixed on my devel branch, but I haven't found the time to package a new snapshot. There is a workaround. But first we should understand the problem: In 0.26 a new option was introduced: to transfer a call directly to voicemail. If you drop the icon over the MWI icon, then it will transfer to the extension defined in VoiceMailExt for that button. If you drop the phone icon anywhere else, then it will transfer as expected. The workaround would be to define VoiceMailExt to be the same extension and context as the button. The fix is to check if that value is empty and if so, transfer to the regular extension@xxxxxxxx The new snapshot that I will be packaging includes also an attendant transfer implementation, but I have to sort some things out design wise before releasing it, because right now it is using the barge mechanics to perform the attendant transfer and you loose the ability to barge into calls. The fastest/easiest way would be to check for attendant transfers options in each panel_context, if there are attendant transfers definitions, then do that, if not, perform the regular barge ins. The ultimate goal would be to have the option to perform attendant transfers and barges in in the same panel contexts. But I have to devise a way to do it with the current UI without cluttering buttons. Any ideas are appreciated. About the attendant transfers, it is not a real attendant transfer but a hack using meetme, with the option to transfer to a defined extension (for example to voicemail) if the transfer destination is busy or fails to connect the call. It seems to work fine, although you will end up with lots of meetme rooms instead of real bridged calls. I will try to implement this using the 'bridge' application/function when it is available. Any comments or ideas are welcome, I will try to package a new snapshot this week. Regards,
|